LINGUOPRAGMATICS OF THE SPEECH ACT "REACTION TO A COMPLIMENT" (based on the material of the Ukrainian language)

Authors

  • Олена Олегівна Бречак Національна академія образотворчого мистецтва і архітектури, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.1.2018.135611

Keywords:

reaction to the compliment, strategies of politeness, cooperative maxims, complex illocution

Abstract

The paper addresses one of the important issues in the field of pragmatics –
the problem of ethnic / cultural specificity of pragmatic reaction to the compliment, which is
understudied as compared to the study of Compliment. The problem of the pragmatic specificity
of the reaction to the compliment in Ukrainian language may contribute to the scientific
research in the field of ethnopragmatics, the pragmatic potential of linguistic-cultural concepts,
ethnic conventions of speech acts.
The purpose of the research is in the revealing of the universal and ethnospecific
characteristics of the reactions to a compliment in the framework of the “face and politeness”
theory, the theory of cooperative principle and implicatures, along with the particular aspects
of the speech acts theory.
The research is grounded on the integrative methodology based on Grice's Cooperative
Principle and the Theory of Conversational Implicatures, Speech Acts' theory and Brown &
Levinson's politeness theory.
The major results refer to the identification of the typical reactions to the compliment
while investigating the ethnospecific manifestations of universal pragmatic strategies of politeness and co-operation. We have identified and described the most widespread reactions of Ukrainians
to compliment. The first type includes the reaction of rejection with the depreciation of the value
of the characteristics denoted by compliment. The second one consists in the compliment
rejection with inversion of the compliment’ssubject. The third one is an implicit rejection. The forth
one is the reaction of rejection with the simultaneous absolutization of the positive-evaluative
characteristic denoted by the compliment. The basic types of ethnospecific manifestations of
universal pragmatic strategies of politeness and co-operation have been identified and analyzed.
The patterns of violations of the cooperative maxims of relevance, quantity and quality of the
information are determined asthe triggers of conversional implicaturessubstantiating the compliment
non-acceptance. Reactive strategies of non-acceptance of the compliment are specified from
the viewpoint of speech acts theory – in the format of the concept of complex illocution.
Conclusions. The paper concludes that the specifics of non-acceptance strategy relies
on the cooperative maxims’flouting, which triggers the conversational implicatures as an additional
explicit substantiation of the compliment non-acceptance. Non-acceptance strategy realizes
the maxim of modesty associated with the structure of the concept of "modesty" in the world
pictures of the Eastern Slavs. Non-acceptance strategy involves additional illocutionary goals
associated either with rejection or with implicit acceptance of the compliment.

Author Biography

Олена Олегівна Бречак, Національна академія образотворчого мистецтва і архітектури

кандидат філологічних наук, доцент

References

Бигунова, Н. А. (2015). Одобрение, похвала, комплимент и лесть в теории речевых актов. Записки з романо-германської філології, 2 (35), 31-40.

Богдан, С. К. (1998). Мовний етикет українців: традиції і сучасність. Київ: Рідна мова.

Зубець Н. О. (2015). Прагматика компліментного акту мовлення. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія“Лінгвістика”, 22, 142-147.

Кравченко, Н. К. (2015). Стратегия псевдо-непринятия комплимента в русской и украинской лингвокультурах. Limes Slavicus. Славянството: границы на общността (с. 131-137). Шумен.

Кравченко, Н. К. (2017). Дискурс и дискурс-анализ: краткая энциклопедия. Киев: Интерсервис.

Кровицька, О. В. (2005). Українська лексикографія: теорія і практика. Львів: Ін-т українознавства ім. І. Крип'якевича НАН України.

Кузенна, Н. М. (2010). Мовний акт “комплімент” в сучасній комунікації. Наукові записки КДПУ. Серія: Філологічні науки (мовознавство), 89 (2), 21-26.

Мельник, І. М. (2013). Ввічливі експресивні акти мовлення (на матеріалі іспанської мови). Вісник Львівського університету. Серія іноземні мови, 21, 177-182.

Мищенко, В. Я. (1999). Косвенные способы реализации иллокуции комплимента. Вісник Харківського державного університету. Романо-германська філологія, 430, 101-107.

Серебрякова, Р. В. (2001). Национальная специфика комплимента и похвалы в русской и английской коммуникативных культурах. Язык, коммуникация и социальная среда, 1, 1-5.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bach, K. (1994). Conversational impliciture. Mind & language, 9, 124-162.

Bach, K. (2012). Saying, meaning, and implicating. The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, edited by Peter K. (pp. 23-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics, 3, 41-58.

Herbert, R. K. (1986). Say “thank you” – or something. American Speech, 61, 76-88.

Holmes, J. (1988). Paying compliments: a sex-preferential politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 445-465.

Horn, L.R. (2004). Implicature. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward. (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 3-28).

Jefferson, G. Side sequences. Studies in social interaction (pp. 294-338). New York: Free Press .

Kravchenko, N. (2017). Illocution of direct speech acts via conventional implicature and semantic presupposition. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The Journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, I(1), 128-168. Retrieved from www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/.

Kravchenko, N. (2017a). Indirect speech acts’ via conversational implicatures and pragmatic presuppositions. Cognition, communication, discourse. International On-line Journal, 14, 54-66. Retrieved from http://sites.google.com/site/cognitiondiscourse

Miriam, R. (2012). Compliment Responses in Italian and German. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 2, 77-100.

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Schegloff, E.A. (1999). Discourse, Pragmatics, Conversation, Analysis. Discourse Studies, 1 (4), 405-435.

Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Issues of Relevance for Discourse Analysis: Contingency in Action, Interaction and Co-Participant Context. Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues – An Interdisciplinary Account. (pp. 3-38). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, 59-82.

Searle, J. R. & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wolfson, N & Manes, J. (1980). The compliment as a social strategy. Papers in Linguistics, 13 (3), 391-410.

Published

2018-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles