ANTIQUITY AND ENGLISHNESS AS LITERARY AESTHETIC FORMS OF NATIONAL IDENTITY IN JOHN KEATS' POETRY
Keywords:John Keats' poetic world, Antiquity and Englishness, cognitive poetics, concept, national identity
The paper focuses on the study of John Keats' poetic world shining with Antiquity and Englishness. Studying
the ways of poetic embodying of these two concepts the paper assumes that Antiquity and Englishness
are considered to be literary aesthetic forms of expressing the national identity in poetic text. Based on
the cognitive poetics and literary studies the paper generates the idea of Keats' world perception and the means
of its verbalization in the text.
The paper focuses on the study of John Keats' poetic world with its Antiquity and Englishness.
Studying the ways of poetic embodying of these two concepts the paper assumes that Antiquity and
Englishness are considered to be literary aesthetic forms of expressing the national identity in poetic
text. The matter is that each poet makes his own unique poetic world, based on his personal experience,
his personal background. John Keats creates antique imagery and in his own artistic way depicts
reminiscences of ancient mythology and art. The paper analyses the ways of depicting this antique
imagery and its functions in literary text. Based on the cognitive methods of literary and linguistic
analysis of poetic texts the paper generates the idea of author's perception, understanding and
verbalization of the sense of national universe and human existence laws.
The dissemination of antique images in Keats' poetry produces an effect of intertextuality.
The aesthetic and pragmatic functions of images reflect the author's individual understanding of interaction
between a human being and the national environment. This poetic intertextual power fosters theperception
of cultural space of the motherland as an organic unity of "the domestic" and "the strange".
Chronotopes and realia in Keats' poetry: 1) favor the embodiment of universal symbolic
meaning both in specifically ethnic, folklore and well-known, prominent ancient imagery forms, which
results in semantic diversity; 2) create an effect of intertextuality; 3) perform evaluative pragmatic
function. Keats uses the antique poetic palette for the creation of multilayer, versatile background
of panorama, which depicts the portrait of his own motherland underlying social, cultural, historical
and ideological implications of these images in the poetic texture. National identity is manifested
in Keats' poetic discourse by semantic superpositions and transformations of imagery poetic forms,
which verbalize the concepts of Antiquity and Englishness.
Aske, M. (1985). Keats and hellenism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bate, J. (1989). Shakespeare and the English romantic imagination. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bennett, A. T. (1994). Keats, narrative and audience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dyakonova, N. A. (1978). English romanticism. The problems of aesthetics. Moscow: Nauka. / Dyakonova N. A.
Angliyskiy romantizm. Problemy estetiki. Moskva: Nauka. / Дьяконова Н. А. Английский романтизм. Проблемы
эстетики. Москва: Наука.
Graver, B. E. (2005). Classical inheritances. In N. Roe (Ed.), Romanticism: An Oxford guide (pp. 38-48).
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harrison, S. (2006). Virgilian contexts. In Ch. Martindale & R. F. Thomas (Eds.), Classics and the uses of
reception (pp. 113-126). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Hartman, G. H. (1970). Romanticism and anti-self-consciousness. In H. Bloom (Ed.), Romanticism and
consciousness (p. 46-56). New York: Norton, W.W. & Co.
Bloom, H. (Ed.). (2007). John Keats. Bloom's modern critical views. New York: Chelsea House Publishers.
Kandl, J. (2001). The politics of Keats' early poetry: "delight" with "liberty". In S. J. Wolfson (Ed.) The Cambridge
companion to Keats (pp. 1-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keats, J. (1900). The complete poetical works of John Keats. Boston & New York: Houghton, Miffin &
Company. Retrieved from https://www.archive.org/details/completepoetical01keat/page/n7/mode/2up
Kennedy, D. F. (2006). Afterword: The Uses of "reception". In Ch. Martindale & R. F. Thomas (Eds.), Classics
and the uses of reception (pp. 288-293). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Martindale, Ch. (2006). Introduction: Thinking through "reception". In Ch. Martindale & R. F. Thomas (Eds.),
Classics and the uses of reception (pp. 1-13). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Pavlychko, S. (1999). Discourse of modernism in Ukrainian literature (2nd ed.). Kyiv: Lybid'. / Pavlychko, S.
Dyskurs modernizmu v ukrainskii literaturi (2-he vyd.). Kyiv: Lybid. / Павличко, С. Дискурс модернізму
в українській літературі (2-ге вид.). Київ: Либідь.
Pinich, I. P. (2019). The discursive emotional aspect of ideological transitions in the Victorian age. Visnyk of
Kyiv National Linguistic University. Series Philology, 22(1), 66-77.
Prihodko, G. I. (2019). Frame structure of the evaluative utterance. Visnyk of Kyiv National Linguistic University.
Series Philology, 22(2), 114-120.
Roe, N. (1997). John Keats and the culture of dissent. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Clarendon Press.
Rzepka, Ch. J. (1986). The self as mind: Vision and identity in Wordsworth, Coleridge and Keats. Cambridge,
MA – London: Harvard University Press.
Wolfson, S. J. (Ed.). (2013). The Cambridge companion to Keats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ulmer, W. A. (2017). John Keats. Reimagining history. Palgrave: Macmillan.
Vitkovskiy, E. (1988). The rise of Endymion. In John Keats. Poetry. Moscow: Ripol Classic. / Vitkovskiy, E.
Voskhod Endimiona. In John Keats. Stikhotvoreniya. Poemy. Moskva: Ripol Klassik. / Витковский, Е. Восход
Эндимиона. B ДжонКитс. Стихотворения. Поэмы. Москва: Рипол Kласcик.
Whitmarsh, T. (2006). True histories: Lucian, Bakhtin, and the pragmatics of reception. In Ch. Martindale, &
R. F. Thomas (Eds.), Classics and the uses of reception (pp. 104-115). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Yelistratova, A. A. (1960). The heritage of English romanticism and modernity. Moscow: USSR Academy of
Sciences Publishing House / Yelistratova, A. A. Naslediye angliyskogo romantizma i sovremennost. Moskva:
Izdatelsvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. / Елистратова, А. А. Наследие английского романтизма и современность.
Москва: Издательство Академии наук СССР.
License1. Authors take full responsibility for the content of the articles as well as the fact of their publication.
2. All the authors must follow the current requirements for publication of manuscripts. Plagiarism itself and its representation as the original work as well as submission to the editorial office previously published articles are unacceptable. In case of plagiarism discovery the authors of the submitted materials take all the responsibility.
3. Authors shall inform the editor of any possible conflict of interests which could be influenced by the publication of the manuscript results.
4. The editorial board has the right to refuse publication of an article in case of non-compliance with these requirements.