DISTRIBUTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SEMANTIC AND SYNTAX VALENCE VERBS IN MODERN FRENCH ARTISTIC TEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.1.2022.263127Keywords:
valence, actant, syntactic construction, context, proposal, distribution, artistic textAbstract
The paper examines the development of the theory of valence of the French verb from L. Tesnière to
the present day, elucidates the relationship between distribution and valence, reveals the conditions for
realizing potential valence in the context of modern French artistic prose works, elucidates characteristic
syntactic constructions for the realization of non-valent, univalent, divalent, trivalent and tetravalent verbs.
The purpose of the article is to outline the reasons and regularities of the decrease and increase in the
valence of the French verb in the literary text. The material of the research is the syntactic constructions
of nine novels by Goncourt laureates of the 21st century, which are reference texts of modern French
literary prose. The applied structural research method determined the use of distributive and component
analyses, as well as analysis by direct components. It was found that the potential valence established
according to the distributional characteristics does not often coincide with the realized valence of the
verb in a specific text. The realization of valence is also influenced by the author’s opinion, in particular,
this is manifested in the use of agrammatic constructions and the occasional use of verbs, which is
provoked by a violation of the distributional characteristics and potential valence of verbs in view of
their semantics. The reduction of semantic-syntactic valence in the context of an artistic work is carried
out due to the use of ellipses in the dialogues of the characters, which is caused by the author’s desire
to reproduce oral speech. An increase in semantic and stylistic valence, in particular in causative and
factitive quadrivalent constructions, occurs in the texts of those authors whose style involves the use of
syntactically complicated polypropositional sentences. Research perspectives are determined by the field
of cognitive syntax, in particular by questions of the roles of circumstances and syntactic synonymy, as
well as the reproduction of the prototype of the expressed situation in the distributional characteristics and
realization of the valence of the verb.
References
Березовська-Савчук, Н. А. (2016). Дистрибутивні характеристики предикатів
стану в українській літературній мові. Кривий Ріг: ФОП Маринченко с. В.
Andres, J. (2010). On a Conjecture about the Fractal Structure of Language. Journal of
Quantitative Linguistics, 17(2), 101-122.
Benini, M., & Gobbo, F. (2011). Constructive Adpositional Grammars: Foundations of
Constructive Linguistics. Newcastle upon Tyne: QHCambridge Scholars Publishing.
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (2002). “La complémentation verbale: petite introduction aux
valences verbales”, Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique, 37, Approches linguistiques
de la complémentation verbale : quels savoirs pour l’enseignant? Quels savoirs pour
l’élève? M.-J. Béguelin, J.-F. de Pietro & A. Näf (éds), 47-73.
Desclés, J.-P. Guentchéva, Z. (2018). La polysémie verbale appréhendée par une sémantique
cognitive et formelle. Le 6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, organisé par
l’Institut de Linguistique Française (CNRS – FR 2393), Mons (Belgique) 9-13 juillet
Hammad, M. (1985). Primauté historique du contenu. Exigences et Perspectives de la
Sémiotique. Recueil d’hommages pour Algirdas Julien Greimas. John Benjamins
Publishing, 229-240.
Herslund, M. (2006). Valence, prédicat, préposition et la notion d’adjet. Modèles
linguistiques, 54, 15-24.
Le Querler, N. (2012). Valence et complémentation: l’exemple des verbes trivalents en
français contemporain. Annales de Normandie, 62, 175-188.
Mendívil-Giró, J. (2019). If everything is syntax, why are words so important? An
a-morphous but non-lexicalist approach. Linguistics, 57(5), 1161-1215.
Najafi, E., & Darooneh, A. H. (2015). The Fractal Patterns of Words in a Text: A Method
for Automatic Keyword Extraction. PLoS ONE, 10(6): e0130617.
Neveu, F., & Roig, A. (2022). L’œuvre de Lucien Tesnière: Lectures contemporaines.
Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Petitot, J. (1995). Approche morphodynamique de l’iconicité des stémmas. Des connexions
tesnièriennes aux images-schèmes des grammaires cognitives. Lucien Tesnère
aujourd’hui. Louvian, Editions Peeters, 105-112.
Raymond, D. (2021). “Une nouvelle manière de voir le monde”. Jalons pour une poétique
de la figure fractale en littérature. Études littéraires, 50(2), 35-49.
Tesnière, L. (1959). Eléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
1. Authors take full responsibility for the content of the articles as well as the fact of their publication.2. All the authors must follow the current requirements for publication of manuscripts. Plagiarism itself and its representation as the original work as well as submission to the editorial office previously published articles are unacceptable. In case of plagiarism discovery the authors of the submitted materials take all the responsibility.
3. Authors shall inform the editor of any possible conflict of interests which could be influenced by the publication of the manuscript results.
4. The editorial board has the right to refuse publication of an article in case of non-compliance with these requirements.