Phonemic structure of the root morpheme in the Gothic language (a complex quantitative analysis of lexicographic sources)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.1.2023.286210Keywords:
Gothic, phonemic structure, root length, root patterns, constructive potential, mirror symmetry, rhythmic symmetryAbstract
The article deals with the problems of the phonemic structure of the root morpheme in Gothic. Using a systematic sampling procedure, the words from a Gothic dictionary were selected to form the register with 382 root morphemes. The study employed a quantitative research with statistical data analysis to
investigate such characteristics of the Gothic root morpheme as its length in phonemes, distribution, combinability and phonotactics of vowel and consonant phonemes within CV root patterns, their constructive potential and symmetry. The investigation has revealed several fundamental regularities that characterize the Gothic root morpheme organizing on the phonemic level. The results of the study have shown that the Gothic language has roots ranging in length from two to nine phonemes, but four-fifths of the analyzed roots consisted of 3-4 phonemes, the average length of the Gothic root in phonemes is 3.55, the multi-phoneme roots are rare and represented mainly by lexical items of non-Germanic origin. The analysis of the realized canonical forms has shown that the Gothic language system uses only 2% of the theoretically possible forms for the construction of root morphemes at the phonemic level. The vast majority of these roots function as dependent roots, only 5% of them function as independent roots that form complete lexical units. The canonical forms of roots in the Gothic language have different modeling power; the most productive among them are three structural types (CVC, CVCC, CCVC), which form almost four fifths of all roots in the studied array. The phonemic structure of the root morpheme is characterized by a significant consonantal saturation: the initial and final components of most canonical forms are formed by consonants, and the medial ones by vowels. Structures of this type describe almost 90% of the total number of roots in the study sample. It has been proven that the phonemic structure of Gothic roots is characterized by symmetry, with the symmetrically constructed roots being mostly characterized by the mirror type of symmetry.
References
Васько, Р. В. (2005). Фонемна структура односкладових словоформ готської мови. Проблеми семантики, прагматики та когнітивної лінгвістики, 7, 35-41.
Вашак, П. (1970). Розподіл довжини слова в слов’янських мовах. Питання структурної лінгвістики. Київ: Вища школа, 178–186.
Голуб, М. С. (2014). Формування показників масиву вхідних даних для ідентифікації авторства текстових повідомлень. Системи обробки інформації, 2, 89-92.
Гороть, Е. И. (1984). Статистичне дослідження фонемної структури кореневої морфеми і складу. Луцьк: ВДУ ім. Лесі Українки.
Макухина, Т. В. (1989). Фонемная структура слов в тексте. Взаимодействие сегментного состава и просодического текста. Киев: Изд-во КПИИЯ, 135–14.
Парк, С. (2019). Моделі побудови кореневої морфеми в готській мові. Science and education: A new dimension. Philology, 189, 46–49.
Перебийніс, В. І. (2013). Статистичні методи для лінгвістів. Вінниця: Нова Книга.
Перебийніс, В. С. (1970). Кількісні та якісні характеристики системи фонем української літературної мови. Київ: Наукова думка.
Петровська, Н. М. (1996). Фонемна структура слова у текстах різних стилів (на матеріалі англійської мови). [Дис. ... канд. філол. наук, Київський національний
лінгвістичний університет].
Романова, О. А. (1999). Фонемна структура складу в текстах різних функціональних стилів (на матеріалі англійської мови) [Дис. ... канд. філол. наук, Волинський державний університет ім. Лесі Українки].
Субота, С. В. (2012). Фонемна структура кореневої морфеми в давньо-, середньо- та новоанглійський період (на матеріалі лексикографічних джерел) [Дис. ... канд. філол. наук, Київський національний лінгвістичний університет].
Colin J. Ewen & Harry van der Hulst (2001). The Phonological Structure of Words: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Datska, Т. О. (2019). General American: Codified Word Phonemic Structure Variation Specifics. Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław, 16, 229–235.
Duanmu San (2009). Syllable Structure: The Limits of Variation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hang Tae Cho (2007). Implications of Old English Syllable Structure and Consonant Phonotactics for Phonological Theory. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.
Herdan, G. (2012). The Advanced Theory of Language as Choice and Chance. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Kessler B. & Treiman R. (1997) Syllable Structure and the Distribution of Phonemes in English Syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 295–311.
Maddieson, I. (2016). Word length is (in part) predicted by phoneme inventory size and syllable structure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139 (4), 2218–2218. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4950645
Park, S. (2020). Phonemic patterning of word-forms in Gothic. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow, V (1), 228–274.
Rottmann, O. (2006). Aspects of the Typology of Slavic Languages. Exemplified on Word Length. Contributions to the Science of Text and Language Text, Speech and Language Technology, 31, 241–258.
Snædal, M. (2013). Gothic letter (and phoneme) statistics. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 130(3), 277–295
Stamatatos, E. (2009). A Survey of Modern Authorship Attribution Methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 538–556.
Strauss, U., Grzybek, P. & Altmann, G. (2007). Word length and Word Frequency. Contributions to the Science of Text and Language. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ulbrich C., Werth A. & Wiese R. (2018). The Word in Phonology: questions and answers. Empirical Approaches to the Phonological Structure. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (pp. 1–12) https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110542899-001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
1. Authors take full responsibility for the content of the articles as well as the fact of their publication.2. All the authors must follow the current requirements for publication of manuscripts. Plagiarism itself and its representation as the original work as well as submission to the editorial office previously published articles are unacceptable. In case of plagiarism discovery the authors of the submitted materials take all the responsibility.
3. Authors shall inform the editor of any possible conflict of interests which could be influenced by the publication of the manuscript results.
4. The editorial board has the right to refuse publication of an article in case of non-compliance with these requirements.