PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF ASSOCIATIVE FIELDS OF WORD-STIMULUS ДРУГ (FRIEND) ACCORDING TO THE DATA OF DIRECTED ASSOCIATIVE EXPERIMENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.2.2017.120851Keywords:
the world reflection, linguistic consciousness, associative experiment, associative field, associative gestaltAbstract
Introduction The associative approach to the study of the meaning of the word is not
a new one in psycholinguistics, however, having received a positive assessment of leading scientists,
it still remains in the priority areas of semantics research next to the parametric, feature, prototype
and situational approaches. Scientists use it both for revealing the ethnocultural specificity of
the image of the world of representatives of various ethnoses, and for a comprehensive analysis
of the meaning of the word of a certain language. We used both perspectives of research in our
previous scientific studies. In this article we present the results of directed associative experiments,
that were held at the beginning of the XXI century in Ukraine. Purpose. The purpose of
the study is to reveal the structure of the associative value by the example of the associative fields
of the stimulus FRIEND in the Ukrainian language. Methods. The main methods of research
are descriptive, structural (component analysis), associative experiment (directed), “associative
gestalt”. Results. The psycholinguistic analysis demonstrates the structure of associative field
of the stimulus FRIEND, obtained as a result of conducting of the directed associative experiments
as for the selection of definitions and comparisons. The placement of zones and their filling show
the main association strategies that we consider as specific components leading in determining
of the associative meaning of the word, in the formation of images of the linguistic consciousness
of Ukrainian respondents. Conclusion The study of the meaning of the word on the material
of lexicographic sources and a number of associative experiments that were applied to a specific
word-stimulus is justified and necessary for the comprehensive identification of semantics.
References
Вежбицкая А. Понимание культур через посредство ключевых слов / А. Вежбицкая. – М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2001. – 288 с
Жайворонок В. В. Знаки української етнокультури : Словник-довідник / Віталій Вікторович Жайворонок. – К. : Довіра, 2006. – 703 с.
Залевская А. А. Введение в психолингвистику / Александра Александровна Залевская. – М. : Российск. гос. гуманит. ун-т, 1999. – 382 с.
Колесов В.В. Мир человека в слове Древней Руси. – Л.: Изд-во Ленинградского ун-та, 1986. – 312 с.
Марковина И. Ю., Данилова Е. В. Специфика языкового сознания русских и американцев: опыт построения “ассоциативного гештальта” текстов оригинала и перевода / И. Ю. Марковина, Е. В. Данилова // Языковое сознание и образ мира / Отв. ред. Н. В. Уфимцева. – М. : Институт языкознания РАН, 2000. – С. 116-132.
Словник української мови: в 11 тт. / АН УРСР. Інститут мовознавства; за ред. І. К. Білодіда. – К.: Наукова думка, 1970–1980. – Т. 2. – С. 422.
Слобин Д., Грин Дж. Психолингвистика / Д. Слобин, Дж. Грин. – М. : Прогресс, 1976. – 350 с.
Степанов Ю. С. Константы: словарь русской культуры : Изд. 2-е, испр. и доп / Юрий Сергеевич Степанов. – М. : Академический проект, 2001. – 990 с.
Уфимцева Н. В. Языковое сознание: динамика и вариативность / Н. В. Уфимцева. – М., Калуга: Институт языкознания РАН (ИП Шилин И.В.), 2011. – 252 с.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
1. Authors take full responsibility for the content of the articles as well as the fact of their publication.2. All the authors must follow the current requirements for publication of manuscripts. Plagiarism itself and its representation as the original work as well as submission to the editorial office previously published articles are unacceptable. In case of plagiarism discovery the authors of the submitted materials take all the responsibility.
3. Authors shall inform the editor of any possible conflict of interests which could be influenced by the publication of the manuscript results.
4. The editorial board has the right to refuse publication of an article in case of non-compliance with these requirements.