Methods of translation of national-cultural information in the semantics of German phraseological units with the component “Phenning” for denotation of autostereotypes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.2.2020.223257Keywords:
stereotype, national and cultural information, phraseological unit, phraseological meaning, reference features, cognitive features, categorizationAbstract
Given the current tendencies in linguistics in the study of linguistic phenomena in the anthropocentricstream and the study of semantics taking into account the national-specific worldview, national culture,
mentality, the proposed article aims at identifying ways to translate national-cultural information in the meaning
of German phraseology with the component “Pfeinng”, which denote autostereotypes. We consider a stereotype
as an established linguistic expression in the form of a phrase (phraseological unit) or a sentence (paremia),
which simply reflects the features of the image of traits, properties, and characteristics of a representative of one's
own or another ethnic group; or an entire ethno group that has an emotional component and provides pragmatic
orienteering in the world.
The image arises in the course of mental objectification in the process of cognition of the object of the real
world. One of the relevant features of the conceptualized image for ethnic consciousness is fixed in the internal
form of PU. The selected features of the image guide the process of nomination in the linguistic-cognitive field.
A language form is chosen that reflects the conceptualized feature of the image. By using a linguistic sign,
thus activating a separate feature of the object, the speaker seems to refer the recipient to the idea of the object
of extra verbal reality. The process of language stereotyping is to verbalize the stereotypical features of an object.
The investigation revealed that the process of language stereotyping is to verbalize the stereotypical features
of the object. Explicit, implicit, explicit-implicit methods are implemented on the material of our research.
Explicit verbalization of signs of stereotypes occurs by actualization of reference features of the denotation.
Implicit expression of signs of stereotypes is realized through emotional and evaluative rethinking of cognitive
signs, or one of the signs of categorized characteristics of a stereotyped object; through a national-specific image
that emerged based on mythological thinking. Simultaneous actualization of reference and cognitive features
of the image provides an implicit embodiment of national and cultural information (NCI) in the semantics of
the phraseological unit in an explicit-implicit way.
As a result of the analysis, four thematic groups with subgroups of German autostereotypes verbalized by PU
with the “Pfennig” component were identified.
References
Алефиренко, Н. Ф. (2010). Языковые стереотипы русского этнокультурного пространства. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 1, 405-424.
Байбурин, А. К. (1985). Некоторые вопросы этнографического изучения поведения. В А. К. Байбурин (Ред.), Этнические стереотипы поведения (сс. 7-22). Ленинград: Наука.
Боровська, Л. (2013). Евристичний потенціал стереотипу як феномену свідомості. Вісник Київського національного торговельно-економічного університету, 4, 92-100. Взято з http://visnik.knute.edu.ua/files/2013/04/9.pdf
Верещагин, Е. М., & Костомаров, В. Г. (1982). Национальная культурная семантика руських фразеологизмов. В Е. М. Верещагин (Ред.), Словари и лингвострановедение (сс. 89-97). Москва: Русский язык.
Вилинбахова, Е. Л. (2011). Модели репрезентации стереотипов в русском языке (Автореферат кандидатской диссертации). Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация.
Голубовська, І. О. (2004). Етноспецифічні константи мовної свідомості (Автореферат докторської дисертації). Інститут філології Київського національного уніврситету імені Тараса Шевченка, Київ, Україна.
Кон, И. С. (1999). Социологическая психология. Москва: Московский психолого-социальный институт.
Кордуэлл, М. (2000). Психология. А-Я: Словарь-справочник (пер. с англ. К. С. Ткаченко) Москва: ФАИР-ПРЕСС.
Липпман, У. (2004). Общественное мнение (пер. с англ. Т. В. Барчуновой). Москва: Институт Фонда “Общественное мнение”.
Орел, І. І. (2012). Раціональна мотивація фразеологічних одиниць сучасної німецької мови (лінгвокогнітивний аспект). Наукові записки [Національного університету “Острозька академія”]. Серія “Філологічна”, 24, 226-229.
Орел, І. І. (2013). Роль національно-культурного компонента в утворенні семантики фразеологізмів сучасної німецької мови. Наукові записки [Національного університету “Острозька академія”]. Серія “Філологічна”, 34, 180-182.
Сорокина, Н. В. (2013). Современные концепции определения понятия “национальный стереотип” в гуманитарных науках: аналитический обзор. Современные исследования социальных проблем, 5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2013-5-41
Coulmas, F. (1981). Routineim Gesprach. Zurpragmatishen Fundirung der Idiomatik. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
Quasthoff, U. M. (1978). The Uses of Stereotype in Everyday Argument: Theoretical and Empirical Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 2(1), 1-48.
Recktenwald, P. (2008). Cent oder Pfennig? Der lange Weg zum Talisman. Genommen von https://www.ksta.de/cent-oder-pfennig--der-lange-weg-zum-talisman-13098118
Turner, J. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: a social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes (pp. 77–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
ЛЕКСИКОГРАФІЧНІ ДЖЕРЕЛА
DDUW: Duden. Deutsches Universalwörterbuch. Mannheim – Leipzig – Wien – Zürich: Dudenverlag.
DSL: Deutsches Sprichwörter-Lexicon von Karl Friedrich Wilhelm Wander. Genommen von http://woerterbuchnetz.de/Wander/call_wbgui_py_from_form?sigle=Wander&lemid=WP00416&
hitlist=&patternlist=&mode=Vernetzung
DWB: Duden. Wörterbuch. Genommen von https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Pfennig
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
1. Authors take full responsibility for the content of the articles as well as the fact of their publication.2. All the authors must follow the current requirements for publication of manuscripts. Plagiarism itself and its representation as the original work as well as submission to the editorial office previously published articles are unacceptable. In case of plagiarism discovery the authors of the submitted materials take all the responsibility.
3. Authors shall inform the editor of any possible conflict of interests which could be influenced by the publication of the manuscript results.
4. The editorial board has the right to refuse publication of an article in case of non-compliance with these requirements.